0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

±âº»°£È£ÇÐȸÁöÀÇ Á¤Ã¼¼º È®¸³À» À§ÇÑ ¼½¼Ç ÆíÁýÀÇ ºÐ·ùƲ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Àç°í

A Study to Identify Contents of the Journal through Review of Classification of Sectional Editorship

±âº»°£È£ÇÐȸÁö 2011³â 18±Ç 2È£ p.267 ~ 276
KMID : 0388320110180020267
±èÁ¾ÀÓ ( Kim Jong-Im ) - Ãæ³²´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú

±è°æÈñ ( Kim Kyung-Hee ) - Áß¾Ó´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú
¹éÈÆÁ¤ ( Paik Hoon-Jung ) - ¿©ÁÖ´ëÇÐ °£È£°ú
¾ö¹Ì¶õ ( Eom Mi-Ran ) - ¸ñÆ÷´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú
Àå¿ÁÀÚ ( Chang Ock-Ja ) - ÇýÀü´ëÇÐ °£È£°ú
ÀÌ¿ì¼÷ ( Lee Woo-Sook ) - Àû½ÊÀÚ°£È£´ëÇÐ
ÀüÇö¼÷ ( Chun Hyun-Sook ) - ´ëÀüº¸°Ç´ëÇÐ °£È£°ú
¹ÎÈ¿¼÷ ( Min Hyo-Suk ) - Ãæ³²´ëÇб³º´¿ø
¿À¼¼¿µ ( Oh Sei-Young ) - ¼­¿ï¿©ÀÚ°£È£´ëÇÐ
¼Û°æ¾Ö ( Sohng Kyeong-Yae ) - °¡Å縯´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ

Abstract

Purpose:The purpose of this study was to provide data for development of the Journal of Fundamentals of Nursing through reviewing classification of sectional editorship.

Method:Descriptive statistical analysis was used, to identify content then, the classifications of sectional editorship were reviewed.

Results:The categories, "Basic concepts of nursing" (30.2%:17.9%), "Needs for comfort" (15.9%:13.1%), "Nursing education" (12.7%:12.7%), and "Needs for activity and exercise" (7.1%:7.1%) were most frequent through both the 1st and 2nd sectional editorship.

Conclusion:Classification of sectional editorship was developed to clarify the educational purpose of fundamentals of nursing, and was modified through reflections by researchers. The current classification of sectional editorship is not a permanent formula, so using various viewpoints in further examination is needed.
KeyWords
°£È£ ¿¬±¸, Àç°í, ÆíÁý
Nursing Research, Review, Editorial
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
 
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed